Masterthread Registration-Suche

ANZEIGE

fakepcy

Erfahrenes Mitglied
29.03.2025
372
488
MNL/LAX
ANZEIGE
yes i found following information:

Details
2009-01-05 9U0863 KIV FRA 0525 0700 ER-AXT
Routing: KIV-FRA
STD: 05.01.2009 03:25 UTC
STD: 05.01.2009 05:25 LT
Offblock: 05.01.2009 03:40 UTC
Offblock: 05.01.2009 05:40 LT
Takeoff: 05.01.2009 03:45 UTC
Takeoff: 05.01.2009 05:45 LT
STA: 05.01.2009 06:00 UTC
STA: 05.01.2009 07:00 LT
Touchdown: 05.01.2009 06:05 UTC
Touchdown: 05.01.2009 07:05 LT
Onblock: 05.01.2009 06:19 UTC
Onblock: 05.01.2009 07:19 LT
Registration: ERAXT
Subfleet: 322
Owner: 9U

-------------
2009-01-05 9U0864 FRA KIV 1500 1820 ER-AXT
Routing: FRA-KIV
STD: 05.01.2009 14:00 UTC
STD: 05.01.2009 15:00 LT
Offblock: 05.01.2009 15:11 UTC
Offblock: 05.01.2009 16:11 LT
Takeoff: 05.01.2009 15:35 UTC
Takeoff: 05.01.2009 16:35 LT
STA: 05.01.2009 16:20 UTC
STA: 05.01.2009 18:20 LT
Touchdown: 05.01.2009 17:29 UTC
Touchdown: 05.01.2009 19:29 LT
Onblock: 05.01.2009 17:34 UTC
Onblock: 05.01.2009 19:34 LT
Registration: ERAXT
Subfleet: 322
Owner: 9U
Oh, so ER-AXT stayed at FRA for 8 hours and did not fly elsewhere? Interesting. What about this flight?

2009-08-31 9U0863 KIV FRA 0505 0640 A320 fakepcy
2009-08-31 9U0864 FRA KIV 1500 1820 A320 fakepcy

They're asking for a KIV-LGW flight, and I'm thinking that the ground time at FRA is quite long to be able to do FRA-LGW-FRA.
 

zeus1309

Erfahrenes Mitglied
17.05.2025
270
669
Oh, so ER-AXT stayed at FRA for 8 hours and did not fly elsewhere? Interesting. What about this flight?

2009-08-31 9U0863 KIV FRA 0505 0640 A320 fakepcy
2009-08-31 9U0864 FRA KIV 1500 1820 A320 fakepcy

They're asking for a KIV-LGW flight, and I'm thinking that the ground time at FRA is quite long to be able to do FRA-LGW-FRA.
2009-08-31 9U0863 KIV FRA 0505 0640 A320 fakepcy
Routing: KIV-FRA
STD: 31.08.2009 02:05 UTC
STD: 31.08.2009 05:05 LT
Offblock: 31.08.2009 01:56 UTC
Offblock: 31.08.2009 04:56 LT
Takeoff: 31.08.2009 02:01 UTC
Takeoff: 31.08.2009 05:01 LT
STA: 31.08.2009 04:40 UTC
STA: 31.08.2009 06:40 LT
Touchdown: 31.08.2009 04:17 UTC
Touchdown: 31.08.2009 06:17 LT
Onblock: 31.08.2009 04:27 UTC
Onblock: 31.08.2009 06:27 LT
Registration: ERAXT
Subfleet: 320
Owner: 9U

-------------
2009-08-31 9U0864 FRA KIV 1500 1820 A320 fakepcy
Routing: FRA-KIV
STD: 31.08.2009 13:00 UTC
STD: 31.08.2009 15:00 LT
Offblock: 31.08.2009 13:00 UTC
Offblock: 31.08.2009 15:00 LT
Takeoff: 31.08.2009 13:13 UTC
Takeoff: 31.08.2009 15:13 LT
STA: 31.08.2009 15:20 UTC
STA: 31.08.2009 18:20 LT
Touchdown: 31.08.2009 15:12 UTC
Touchdown: 31.08.2009 18:12 LT
Onblock: 31.08.2009 15:17 UTC
Onblock: 31.08.2009 18:17 LT
Registration: ERAXT
Subfleet: 320
 
  • Like
Reaktionen: fakepcy

SaschaX99

Erfahrenes Mitglied
25.10.2013
2.267
1.787
CGN
Hi @zeus1309 do you have any other info on what ER-AXT did at FRA on January 5, 2009?

2009-01-05 9U0863 KIV FRA 0525 0700 ER-AXT
2009-01-05 9U0864 FRA KIV 1500 1820 ER-AXT

Someone is looking for info for a KIV-LHR flight that day, and the most likely stop, if there was, was at FRA. I'm thinking that FlightStats lacked info for FRA-LHR-FRA.
Here a timetable. Wayback shows the following so I guess it's from 08/2009

FILE ARCHIVED ON 00:00:41 Aug 11, 2009 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 21:00:49 Apr 05, 2026.

9u 2009.png


and here from 01/2009 FILE ARCHIVED ON 18:19:29 Jan 29, 2009 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE

9u 012009.png
 
  • Wow
Reaktionen: fakepcy

fakepcy

Erfahrenes Mitglied
29.03.2025
372
488
MNL/LAX
@fakepcy and here also with STD and STA for sommer 2009 adn winter 2008/2009
Interesting because that would mean:

2009-01-06 9U0883 KIV CDG 1830 2040 ER-AXV
2009-01-06 9U0883 CDG STN 2130 2130 ER-AXV
2009-09-01 9U0883 KIV CDG 1740 1940 ER-AXV
2009-09-01 9U0883 CDG LGW 2050 2040 ER-AXV

They probably got the details wrong which explains why I wasn't able to find anything on the given dates.
 

SaschaX99

Erfahrenes Mitglied
25.10.2013
2.267
1.787
CGN
Interesting because that would mean:

2009-01-06 9U0883 KIV CDG 1830 2040 ER-AXV
2009-01-06 9U0883 CDG STN 2130 2130 ER-AXV
2009-09-01 9U0883 KIV CDG 1740 1940 ER-AXV
2009-09-01 9U0883 CDG LGW 2050 2040 ER-AXV
I think so because according to the timetable there was no flight to London on Mondays.

2009-01-06 9U0883 KIV CDG 1830 2040 ER-AXV
2009-01-06 9U0883 CDG STN 2130 2130 ER-AXV

SBS-1/3-receivers located ~100km around Amsterdam.
  • 504D51 ER-AXV A320 2011-2015
  • 504001 ER-AXV! A320 MLD883 2335-0010

2009-09-01 9U0883 KIV CDG 1740 1940 ER-AXV
2009-09-01 9U0883 CDG LGW 2050 2040 ER-AXV

SBS-1/3-receivers located ~100km around Amsterdam.
504D51 ER-AXV A320 MLD883 2324-2353
 
  • Like
Reaktionen: fakepcy

fakepcy

Erfahrenes Mitglied
29.03.2025
372
488
MNL/LAX
Whoa, where did you get this? I'm guessing it's now safe to eliminate S2-AFL.

S2-AFL
BG88 DAC-BKK 11:20-15:00
BG89 BKK-DAC 16:15-18:00

Schedules clash with:
BG97 DAC-DEL 15:00-17:20
BG98 DEL-DAC 18:20-21:15

For some reason, S2-AFL and S2-AFM had exceptionally poor/limited tracking in 2019 compared to the previous and next years.

This leaves @ChronicTraveller's options down to S2-AFM and S2-AHO.
@ChronicTraveller this might be solved if you remember what the nose looked like. In November 2019, S2-AFM had eyebrows, whereas S2-AHO had none but was named Meghdoot.